[Chinese] MetaMask is a non-custodial browser wallet and JIL Wallet is an split-key signing threshold-signing wallet, and they serve different markets with different security models. MetaMask stores private keys in browser local storage, primarily serving Ethereum and EVM chain DeFi users. JIL Wallet uses 2-of-3 key-share signing targeting institutional users who require compliance infrastructure, wallet protection, and multi-chain support beyond EVM ecosystems.
[Chinese] Browser extension wallets store keys in software memory accessible to the browser environment, making them vulnerable to phishing attacks, malicious browser extensions, and website exploits. For institutional-scale assets, this risk profile is unacceptable. Split-key custody eliminates the single-point-of-failure risk inherent in browser-based key storage.
[Chinese] JIL Wallet eliminates single-point-of-failure risk through key splitting. No single device or party can sign on its own. The wallet supports 13 chains (including non-EVM: Bitcoin, Solana, XRP, Stellar, Cosmos), adds automatic protection, post-quantum cryptography, biometric identity verification, and regulatory compliance tools.
For institutional use, yes. JIL provides key splitting (no browser key storage risk), protection, 13-chain support including non-EVM chains, and compliance tools. MetaMask is designed for individual DeFi users on EVM chains.
JIL Wallet supports Ethereum and 12 other blockchains. The wallet provides institutional-grade security for interacting with on-chain applications.